Census tract · McKenzie County
Census Tract 9625, McKenzie County, North Dakota
Census Tract 9625, GEOID 38053962500, in McKenzie County, North Dakota, partly within Yellowstone Township, Tri Township, Sioux Township, Alex Township, Charbon Township, Alexander, Randolph Township, Antelope Creek Township, East Fairview and Arnegard Township. 2,089 residents in the ACS 2020-2024 5-year estimates (±261); the 2020 Census counted 1,937.
Residents, 2020-2024
2,089
±261 (90% margin)
2020 Census count: 1,937
Median household income
$92,098
±$13,705 (90% margin)
McKenzie County: $93,404
Median home value
$301,400
±$84,772 (90% margin)
McKenzie County: $349,600
Median gross rent
$2,091
±$268 (90% margin)
McKenzie County: $1,284
Where is Census Tract 9625?
Census Tract 9625 is one of 5 census tracts in McKenzie County, North Dakota. It covers 1,119.20 square miles of land, 2 residents per square mile in 2020. Its GEOID, 38053962500, names it uniquely (how tract numbers and GEOIDs work).
| Place | Share of the tract |
|---|---|
| Yellowstone Township | 16% |
| Tri Township | 9% |
| Sioux Township | 7% |
| Alex Township | 6% |
| Charbon Township | 5% |
| Alexander | 5% |
| Randolph Township | 4% |
| Antelope Creek Township | 4% |
| East Fairview | 2% |
| Arnegard Township | 1% |
8 census tracts border Census Tract 9625: Tract 9631 in Billings County ($86,806), Tract 9629 in Golden Valley County ($68,021), Tract 9623.01 ($101,984), Tract 9623.02 ($132,188), Tract 9535 in Williams County ($101,729), Tract 9536 in Williams County ($100,564), Tract 9537.02 in Williams County ($94,511) and Tract 9541 in Williams County ($83,155). The figure in brackets is each tract's median household income.
Whether a tract counts as low- or moderate-income for bank lending (the Community Reinvestment Act) is set by the FFIEC against its metro area's family income: look it up in the FFIEC census geocoder.
Source: 2024 Gazetteer and 2020 block assignment files, U.S. Census Bureau · Census reference files
How many people live in Census Tract 9625?
The 2020-2024 American Community Survey puts Census Tract 9625's population at 2,089 (±261) in 991 households; the 2020 Census counted 1,937 residents and 935 housing units.
| Measure | Tract 9625 | McKenzie County |
|---|---|---|
| Total population | 2,089 ±261 | 14,321 |
| Households | 991 ±150 | 5,997 |
| Average household size | 2.08 ±0.24 | 2.34 |
| Housing units | 1,204 ±163 | 7,752 |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026); 2020 Census P.L. 94-171 · Check it at data.census.gov
Who lives in Census Tract 9625?
The median resident of Census Tract 9625 is 40.5 years old; 24.9% are under 18 and 15.5% are 65 or older. The largest group is non-Hispanic white residents at 85.1%, then non-Hispanic Black residents at 6.0%.
| Measure | Tract 9625 | McKenzie County |
|---|---|---|
| Median age | 40.5 ±3.6 | 31.5 |
| Under 18 years | 24.9% ±5.4 pts | 31.1% |
| 65 years and over | 15.5% ±3.8 pts | 9.3% |
| Hispanic or Latino (any race) | 1.5% ±1.4 pts | 12.1% |
| White alone, not Hispanic | 85.1% ±6.0 pts | 73.7% |
| Black or African American alone, not Hispanic | 6.0% ±5.2 pts | 1.9% |
| Asian alone, not Hispanic | 0.0% ±0.2 pts | 1.1% |
| American Indian and Alaska Native alone, not Hispanic | 2.9% ±2.6 pts | 6.6% |
| Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, not Hispanic | 0.0% ±1.2 pts | 0.0% |
| Two or more races, not Hispanic | 4.5% ±2.0 pts | 4.5% |
| Some other race alone, not Hispanic | 0.0% ±1.2 pts | 0.2% |
| Born outside the United States | 0.4% ±0.4 pts | 5.0% |
| Speak a language other than English at home (age 5+) | 0.1% ±0.2 pts | 7.7% |
| Civilian veterans (age 18+) | 5.7% ±2.2 pts | 4.9% |
| With a disability | 15.5% ±5.3 pts | 8.9% |
| No health insurance coverage | 13.3% ±6.0 pts | 10.9% |
| High school graduate or higher (age 25+) | 93.3% ±2.7 pts | 89.1% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (age 25+) | 17.4% ±3.6 pts | 19.1% |
| Graduate or professional degree (age 25+) | 1.8% ±1.1 pts | 3.9% |
| Lived in the same house a year earlier | 89.0% ±5.2 pts | 81.8% |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profiles DP02, DP05) · Check it at data.census.gov
What do households in Census Tract 9625 earn?
Half of the 991 households in Census Tract 9625 earn less than $92,098 a year (±$13,705), against $93,404 across McKenzie County: 3rd highest of the county's 5 tracts with a reliable estimate. 7.1% of residents live below the poverty line.
| Measure | Tract 9625 | McKenzie County |
|---|---|---|
| Median household income | $92,098 ±$13,705 | $93,404 |
| Mean household income | $141,209 ±$18,744 | $136,029 |
| Per capita income | $57,781 ±$9,767 | $51,333 |
| People below the poverty line | 7.1% ±3.9 pts | 12.0% |
| Children under 18 below the poverty line | 1.5% ±2.4 pts | 12.8% |
| Households receiving SNAP | 0.6% ±0.7 pts | 3.4% |
| Households with a computer | 87.1% ±6.2 pts | 95.7% |
| Households with a broadband subscription | 84.5% ±6.5 pts | 89.1% |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profile DP03) · Check it at data.census.gov
What does housing cost in Census Tract 9625?
Owners occupy 72.5% of Census Tract 9625's occupied homes and renters 27.5%. The median owner-occupied home is valued at $301,400 by its owner (±$84,772). The median renter pays $2,091 a month including utilities.
| Measure | Tract 9625 | McKenzie County |
|---|---|---|
| Median home value (owner-occupied) | $301,400 ±$84,772 | $349,600 |
| Median gross rent | $2,091 ±$268 | $1,284 |
| Renters paying 35% or more of income on rent | 19.2% ±12.8 pts | 17.1% |
| Median monthly owner costs, with a mortgage | $2,207 ±$416 | $2,274 |
| Owner-occupied homes | 72.5% ±8.8 pts | 53.4% |
| Renter-occupied homes | 27.5% ±8.8 pts | 46.6% |
| Housing units | 1,204 ±163 | 7,752 |
| Single-family detached homes | 66.8% ±5.8 pts | 46.2% |
| Mobile homes | 28.2% ±5.5 pts | 18.8% |
| Built 2020 or later | 3.4% ±2.7 pts | 1.1% |
| Built 2010 to 2019 | 28.0% ±5.9 pts | 54.1% |
| Built 1939 or earlier | 14.0% ±4.3 pts | 6.4% |
| Households with no vehicle | 8.1% ±5.6 pts | 5.0% |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profile DP04) · Check it at data.census.gov
How do people in Census Tract 9625 get to work?
82.0% of Census Tract 9625's workers drive alone. The average trip to work takes 22.7 minutes.
| Measure | Tract 9625 | McKenzie County |
|---|---|---|
| In the labor force (age 16+) | 65.3% ±6.1 pts | 69.8% |
| Unemployment rate | 0.6% ±0.9 pts | 1.3% |
| Drove alone to work | 82.0% ±7.3 pts | 78.0% |
| Carpooled | 6.8% ±4.2 pts | 9.8% |
| Public transportation | 0.9% ±1.1 pts | 0.1% |
| Walked | 2.1% ±1.8 pts | 2.1% |
| Worked from home | 7.7% ±5.1 pts | 8.8% |
| Mean travel time to work | 22.7 min ±2.7 | 22.9 min |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profile DP03) · Check it at data.census.gov
How does Census Tract 9625 compare with the other tracts in McKenzie County?
Among McKenzie County's tracts with a reliable estimate, Census Tract 9625 ranks as shown below (1 = highest).
| Measure | In McKenzie County |
|---|---|
| Population | 3rd of 5 |
| Residents per square mile | 5th of 5 |
| Median household income | 3rd of 5 |
| Per capita income | 2nd of 5 |
| Median home value | 4th of 5 |
| Median gross rent | 1st of 4 |
| Poverty rate | 3rd of 3 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 4th of 5 |
| Median age | 1st of 5 |
| Owner-occupied share | 2nd of 5 |
The tracts next to it on McKenzie County's income ladder
| Tract | Rank | Median household income |
|---|---|---|
| Tract 9623.02 | 1st | $132,188±$75,394 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 9623.01 | 2nd | $101,984±$30,444 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 9625 | 3rd | $92,098±$13,705 |
| Tract 9624 | 4th | $91,745±$22,044 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 9401 | 5th | $59,784±$11,776 |
"Within the margin": the two incomes differ by less than their combined 90% margins, so the survey cannot say which is higher and the ranks between them are not firm.
Source: PlainCities ranks computed from the American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) · How ranks are computed
How reliable are the figures for Census Tract 9625?
4 of the 18 figures for Census Tract 9625 on this page carry a coefficient of variation over 40% and are marked with a ring: they come from a small sample, so read them as rough.
A census tract's figures rest on a few hundred sampled households over five years, so its margins are wider than a city's. Two tracts differ only when the gap between them is larger than their combined 90% margin (the square root of the sum of the two squared margins). How to read a margin of error.
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026): margins of error as published · Check it at data.census.gov
How these figures are made: methodology and release checks · reading a margin of error · every state · corrections