Side-by-side metrics and state or size-class ranks use the same Census and FBI fields shown on this profile. Results stay in the URL so you can bookmark or share them.
Place dossier plate
SheetCA-BANNING-CA · Banning, CA 30,680 pop · income 32nd pct
Instrument codes from this place’s ACS population and household income, BEA state COL, FBI safety, national income percentile, photo-finish peer city, home-value band, and matched Census-tract book - not a moving recommendation.
Income neighbourhood around Banning
Lowest/highest poles plus peers nearest Banning on median household income. Full ladder: /browse and /rankings.
median HH income
Leon Valley · lowest
57,695
Leon Valley · lowest
57,695 median HH income
23.1% of the leader · rank #1
Trimble · near
57,697
Trimble · near
57,697 median HH income
23.1% of the leader · rank #2
Banning · this city
57,699
Banning · this city
57,699 median HH income
23.1% of the leader · rank #3
Jacinto City · near
57,703
Jacinto City · near
57,703 median HH income
23.1% of the leader · rank #4
Georgetown · near
57,704
Georgetown · near
57,704 median HH income
23.1% of the leader · rank #5
Los Altos · highest
250,001
Los Altos · highest
250,001 median HH income
100.0% of the leader · rank #6
What this shows Neighbourhood peers only - not a full nationwide city board. Open a near peer when the gap is small; open the poles when the spread is wide.
Compare beyond this state
Nationwide peers by population, income, and FBI crime rate
Out-of-state nearest neighbors for Banning on ACS population and median household income
, plus FBI UCR reporting rate when the extract covers this place. Link sets are deduped so each column is a distinct comparison path, not a forecast that peers share a labor market or climate.
Similar population
Nearest out-of-state cities by ACS population. This city: 30,680.
Agency-reported UCR totals per 100,000 population, not a neighborhood safety grade or a prediction of personal risk.
Banning - the verdict
Banning ranks in the 32nd percentile for household income and the 49th percentile for safety nationally, out of every US city with at least 1,000 residents. Source: Census ACS + FBI UCR.
32nd
percentile, household income
68th
percentile, home value
88th
percentile, median rent
49th
percentile, safety
📝 How we sourced this
Population, income, and housing-cost figures come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-year estimates (B-series tables). Crime data uses FBI UCR; climate uses NOAA Climate Normals; school counts come from NCES Common Core of Data; permits use the Census Building Permits Survey (BPS). See our methodology page for the full ETL pipeline and OMB / FIPS join keys.
Data Snapshot: Banning, CA
California's Banning is a small city, with 30,680 residents per the latest Census Bureau ACS figures. The typical household in Banning brings in $57,699 a year, below the median for U.S. cities on this measure, with a poverty rate of 15.5%. Typical homes in Banning are valued around $322,900, and the median resident age is 43.3 years. Educational attainment runs 17.4% of adults with a bachelor's degree or higher. Separately, 45.0% of working-age residents are in the labor force.
The Census Building Permit Survey recorded 76 residential units authorized here in 2024 (Building Boom), up 591% from five years earlier. Banning reports a comparatively low crime rate: per-100,000 total crime stands at 1392.1 in FBI UCR data, below the national average (a voluntary reporting program, read this as reporting activity, not a definitive danger score).
California carries a cost-of-living premium: the state registers 110.7 on a 100-equals-national-average index (Well Above Average) per BEA Regional Price Parities 2024. HUD Fair Market Rent for a typical two-bedroom in this state is $2,053 per month. Statewide, average monthly utility bills in California run around $275, per EIA 2023 residential energy data. Natural-hazard exposure scores 88.7 out of 100 on FEMA's National Risk Index (Very High).
A decision-led reading path
Useful questions to ask of Banning's data
How this reading path is ordered
This is not a composite city score. It is a city-specific route through the available public records, ordered for this profile so the page starts with questions the joined data can actually answer. The route here runs from housing and income to population change to comparison shortlist to work and mobility to reported crime to schools and households; another city can have a different sequence or fewer supported layers because the source joins are not uniform.
For Banning, city-specific coverage includes local building permits, annual population history, commute-mode shares, FBI reported-crime rates, matched public-school count.
No matched row is reported here for within-city Census tract profiles; the page leaves those layers out instead of substituting a statewide or national value.
Question 1
How far does income reach against housing in Banning?
The home-value-to-income reference is comparatively stretched: the ACS median home value is 5.6 times median household income. The ACS poverty estimate is 15.5%, which keeps the citywide median from describing every household.
This is a citywide price-to-income reference, not a mortgage-affordability test; it does not include interest rates, taxes, insurance, household size, or an individual buyer's down payment. Housing value is high relative to the citywide income median. That flags a question for comparison, not a verdict: tenure, household composition, financing costs, and the age of the ACS estimate can all change what a resident actually pays.
Recent estimates point upward. Growth can increase housing demand and service needs, but the permit record must move in the same direction before calling it a supply response; the two series measure different things.
Census PEP estimates show the population grew by +2,037 residents from 2020 to 2025, a +6.8% change. Separately, Census BPS recorded 76 housing units authorized in 2024. PEP and ACS are different Census series, so the trend is kept separate from the headline ACS population.
Which cities make useful reference points for Banning?
Within California, the closest population matches are Los Altos (30,736 residents, $250,000+ income); La Verne (30,804 residents, $104,565 income); Burlingame (30,526 residents, $168,832 income). Outside the state, the closest population matches in this dataset are Washington, UT (30,686 residents); West Falls Church, VA (30,660 residents); Miami Lakes, FL (30,731 residents). A third, income-matched reference set of 6 out-of-state cities sits in the income neighbourhood chart near the Place Dossier plate. These are mechanical peer sets, not claims that the places share a labor market, climate, culture, or metro context.
Use the in-state set to hold state policy and broad price conditions more nearly constant. Use the nationwide size set to ask whether cities with a similar resident count produce different housing, income, or commute outcomes. The income set is a third lens, deliberately separate from population matching. The nationwide peer panel below adds a fourth FBI UCR reporting-rate lens, not personal risk.
What does the journey to work look like in Banning?
Mode share answers how workers usually travel; it does not measure congestion, reliability, distance to a particular job, or the quality of transit service. No single mode completely explains the work trip here. The mix is more useful than a one-number commute grade, especially when comparing places where transit, walking, and remote work divide the non-driving share differently.
Driving alone is the largest reported mode at 79.3%. A reliable mean commute time is not available for this row, so the mode shares carry the comparison.
These joined records add useful context, but they do not need another full-size panel. Each remains a separate measure with its own geography and source boundary.
Reported crime
What can the FBI record say about safety in Banning?
Treat this as a reporting-rate comparison, not a prediction of personal risk or a neighborhood-level safety grade. Tourism, daytime population, reporting practices, and variation inside the city are not adjusted away. The state rank and same-state peer table are the narrower comparisons available on this page.
The joined FBI UCR record reports 1392.1 violent and property crimes per 100,000 residents, below the 2280.5 national reference used here. The difference is 39% lower in arithmetic terms, but agency participation is voluntary and reporting completeness varies.
Property rate
925.0
Violent rate
467.1
Total reported rate
1392.1
FBI Uniform Crime Reporting, incidents per 100,000. Voluntary agency reporting; not a danger score.
The NCES join finds 9 public schools within the city match. 17.4% of adults age 25+ hold a bachelor's degree or higher in the ACS estimate. These measures answer different questions: the school count describes local institutions, while adult attainment describes residents and cannot be used as a school-quality rating.
The city has a broader matched school footprint, but count alone does not describe performance, capacity, program availability, or attendance boundaries. This profile deliberately avoids converting it into an unsupported family-friendliness score.
Matched public schools
9
Bachelor's degree+
17.4%
Poverty estimate
15.5%
NCES Common Core of Data school locations plus Census ACS resident characteristics.
Below median income · poverty 15.5% (High poverty)
Cost of Living Index (state)
110.7 (US=100)
Highest-decile cost · BEA RPP 2024, California average
F
City profile score · Banning, CA
21/100
5 published dimensions · ACS/FBI 2023
Comparative score against U.S. cities with population of 1,000 or more on Census ACS medians
(income, poverty, bachelor's share, cost of living) and FBI UCR violent-crime rates when
published. Higher means a stronger standing on those published figures, not a livability
rating, not a recommendation to move, buy, or pick a "best" city. Missing inputs drop out
and redistribute weight.
How it is calculated.
Household income F
$57,699
Median household income vs U.S. cities (pop ≥1,000); ACS.
Bachelor's+ share F
17.4%
Adults with a bachelor's degree or higher; ACS.
Poverty rate F
15.5%
Share of residents below the poverty line; lower scores better on this axis.
Violent crime F
467 /100k
FBI UCR violent offenses per 100,000 residents; lower is stronger on this axis.
Cost of living F
110.7 index
BEA state Regional Price Parities index (100 ≈ national average); lower is stronger on this axis. Same value for every city in the state.
Banning profile (scored ACS/FBI dimensions)Read the chart values
Household income: 31/100 (F) · $57,699
Bachelor's+ share: 27/100 (F) · 17.4%
Poverty rate: 22/100 (F) · 15.5%
Violent crime: 18/100 (F) · 467 /100k
Cost of living: 6/100 (F) · 110.7 index
Where Banning sits on home value vs crime among peer cities
Banning's median home value and FBI crime rate plotted with similar-size and
same-state peers (padded with large cities when the peer set is thin). The second
read: pricey does not always mean safer, check which quadrant this city lands in.
Census ACS median home value vs FBI UCR crime rate - Banning highlighted among 10 peers.Read the chart values
Banning, CA (this city): home $322,900, crime 1,392/100k
Washington, UT : home $511,100, crime 999/100k
Miami Lakes, FL : home $577,300, crime 1,415/100k
Lawrenceville, GA : home $335,100, crime 2,497/100k
Los Altos, CA : home $2,000,000+, crime 1,289/100k
La Verne, CA : home $793,900, crime 2,586/100k
Burlingame, CA : home $2,000,000+, crime 2,209/100k
Laguna Hills, CA : home $944,000, crime 1,365/100k
Saratoga, CA : home $2,000,000+, crime 689/100k
Lawndale, CA : home $726,000, crime 2,459/100k
How does Banning compare to other US cities?
Here's how Banning stacks up against the full field of US cities (population 1,000+), computed live from Census and FBI data.
Household income32% higher than other cities
Home value68% pricier than other cities
Median rent88% pricier than other cities
Safety49% safer than other cities
"Safer than" reflects total crime rate from FBI UCR; the others use Census ACS estimates.
A national percentile can hide a lot of local variation: narrowed to California alone, Banning ranks #123 of 441 California cities by lowest crime rate - a different, more locally useful comparison than stacking it against the entire country.
How we calculate these percentiles & ranks
Each percentile compares Banning against every qualifying US city; each in-state rank narrows that to California only. Full formula and direction notes: methodology.
California-relative analysis
Median Gross Rent places Banning near the bottom of California's cities
Among the 1,458 California cities PlainCities tracks with reported median gross rent data, Banning ranks #1 - the 0th percentile within the state. This is a different, narrower cut than the nationwide percentiles above: it compares Banning only against its own state's cities, not the full US field.
Median Household Income
#1,085 of 1,338
19th percentile in California
Median Gross Rent
#1 of 1,458
0th percentile in California
Median Home Value
#1,021 of 1,343
24th percentile in California
Poverty Rate
#282 of 1,450
80th percentile in California
Bachelor's Degree or Higher
#971 of 1,458
33rd percentile in California
How in-state ranks are ordered
Ranked by raw value (highest first); a higher rank is not automatically "better" for every measure, see each metric's own context above. This is a comparison within California only, not a livability score. See the methodology for the source and calculation.
Gauge source note
32nd percentile nationally for median household income · 49th percentile for safety (lower crime rate). Source: Census ACS 2023 / FBI UCR 2023.
Banning's profile vs. every US city
Income, affordability, and safety percentile
Banning's percentile rank on 3 favorable-direction measures (income, affordability, safety) vs. every tracked US city -- higher on every axis is more favorable. Not a composite quality score, just the arithmetic mean of the axes shown.
How Banning's home value compares nationally
Median home value vs. every US city (population 1,000+)
$322,90032nd percentilemore affordable than 32% of 15,600 US cities
Show national distribution
Each bar is a $25K-wide band; taller bars hold more US cities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-Year Estimates · 2023
Banning's home-value-to-income ratio: 5.6×
ACS median home value divided by median household income.
Band
pressured
> 5.0×
National rank
#13,697 of 15,516
More affordable than 12% of tracked cities (pop. 1,000+)
Size class
#2,852 of 3,317
Small cities (10,000–49,999)
At 5.6×, Banning sits in the pressured band:
national rank #13,697 of 15,516 and #2,852 of 3,317small cities (10,000–49,999).
Housing value is high relative to the citywide income median, a comparison flag, not a verdict on any household.
How this ratio is calculated
Ratio = Census ACS 2023 median home value ÷ median household income for cities with both fields and population ≥ 1,000.
Rank 1 = lowest ratio (most compact). Bands match the fleet affordability thresholds used on guides (<3.0 / 3.0–5.0 / >5.0).
This is not a mortgage payment estimate and does not include rates, taxes, insurance, or down payment.
Income distribution context
$57,699Banning, CA median household income (Census ACS)
Show U.S. national quintile / Lorenz context Banning, CA median household income (Census ACS 5-year) with U.S. national quintile shares for context. Diagonal = equality; the curve is national, not computed for Banning, CA.
Key socioeconomic indicators
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)17.4%
Census ACS S1501, educational attainment
Poverty rate (households below FPL)15.5%
Census ACS S1701, poverty status
Labor force participation (adults 16+)45.0%
Census ACS S2301, share of working-age residents in the labor force
Population
30,680
Median Income
$57,699
Median Home Value
$322,900
Median Age
43.3
Poverty Rate
15.5%
Labor force participation
45.0%
Bachelor's Degree+
17.4%
Safety & Crime
Total Crime Rate
1392.1
per 100,000 residents
Violent Crime
467.1
per 100,000 residents
Property Crime
925.0
per 100,000 residents
Crime reporting caveat
Reflects incidents reported to the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting program — agency participation is voluntary and reporting completeness varies by jurisdiction and year, so this reflects reporting activity, not a definitive danger score. Not adjusted for tourism, commuter, or daytime population.
Schools
Total Schools
9
Public schools in this city
Population Change
PEP vintage
Annual U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP) estimates, 2020–2025
Banning's Census PEP population estimates, 2020–2025.Read the chart as text
Period
Population
2020
29,815 residents
2021
30,773 residents
2022
31,213 residents
2023
31,595 residents
2024
31,850 residents
2025
31,852 residents
Housing Supply
BPS source
Census Bureau Building Permits Survey (BPS) - annual residential permits authorized
📈 Building Boom
Total Permits (2024)
76
housing units authorized
Single-Family
76
detached homes
Multifamily
0
apartments & condos
Supply Intensity
2.5
permits per 1,000 residents
5-Year Permit Trend (2019–2024)
Year
Total
Single-Family
Multifamily
Est. Value
2019
11
11
0
$2.2M
2020
476
476
0
$142.2M
2021
212
212
0
$33.9M
2022
153
153
0
$20.9M
2023
294
294
0
$44.2M
2024
76
76
0
$15.9M
Permit volume increased 591% from 2019 to 2024.
Commute Patterns
Commute source
How workers travel to work, Census ACS 2023
Drive Alone
79.3%
Carpool
11.7%
Public Transit
1.6%
Walk
0.4%
Work from Home
6.1%
Other
0.9%
Based on 10,876 workers 16 and over.
Monthly Utility Costs
California statewide monthly utility average (EIA 2023): $275
EIA 2023 residential energy data puts average monthly utilities across California at $275 (electricity about $150 , water and sewer about $70 ).
These are California statewide averages, not a meter reading for Banning. Actual bills vary by home size, usage, and local rates. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2023.
Living Costs & Risk
California's BEA cost-of-living index is 110.7 (Well Above Average; US average = 100, RPP 2024). HUD Fair Market Rent for a typical two-bedroom in the county around Banning is $2,053/mo. FEMA's National Risk Index, averaged to California statewide on PlainCities, rates natural-hazard exposure at 88.7 / 100 (Very High).
Cost/risk geography note
Cost of living is a California statewide BEA average; rent is a county-level HUD Fair Market Rent for the county Banning sits in; the FEMA hazard score shown here is a statewide average of county NRI inputs, not a parcel-level reading.
How Banning compares to similar-size California cities
Same-state peer method
Closest same-state population matches, not geographic neighbors. Population + median household income come from Census Bureau ACS 5-year B01001 and B19013.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-Year 2023, FBI UCR, NCES CCD, Census BPS 2024, Census ACS B08301/B08136, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2023, BEA Regional Price Parities 2024, HUD Fair Market Rents 2026, FEMA National Risk Index.