Census tract · Richland County
Census Tract 102, Richland County, South Carolina
Census Tract 102, GEOID 45079010200, in Richland County, South Carolina, partly within Blythewood and Columbia. 6,370 residents in the ACS 2020-2024 5-year estimates (±778); the 2020 Census counted 6,066.
Residents, 2020-2024
6,370
±778 (90% margin)
2020 Census count: 6,066
Median household income
$61,368
±$20,800 (90% margin)
Richland County: $63,784
Median home value
$249,700
±$57,747 (90% margin)
Richland County: $242,800
Median gross rent
$679
±$43 (90% margin)
Richland County: $1,228
Where is Census Tract 102?
Census Tract 102 is one of 98 census tracts in Richland County, South Carolina. It covers 73.95 square miles of land, 82 residents per square mile in 2020. Its GEOID, 45079010200, names it uniquely (how tract numbers and GEOIDs work).
| Place | Share of the tract |
|---|---|
| Blythewood | 8% |
| Columbia | 1% |
12 census tracts border Census Tract 102: Tract 9603.01 in Fairfield County ($68,913), Tract 9605.01 in Fairfield County ($56,938), Tract 9605.02 in Fairfield County ($44,934), Tract 101.05 ($82,839), Tract 101.06 ($93,583), Tract 103.13 ($129,718), Tract 103.14 ($97,621), Tract 103.15 ($81,571), Tract 104.08, Tract 105.01 ($47,781), Tract 107.01 ($61,863) and Tract 107.02 ($58,134). The figure in brackets is each tract's median household income.
Whether a tract counts as low- or moderate-income for bank lending (the Community Reinvestment Act) is set by the FFIEC against its metro area's family income: look it up in the FFIEC census geocoder.
Source: 2024 Gazetteer and 2020 block assignment files, U.S. Census Bureau · Census reference files
How many people live in Census Tract 102?
The 2020-2024 American Community Survey puts Census Tract 102's population at 6,370 (±778) in 2,666 households; the 2020 Census counted 6,066 residents and 2,650 housing units.
| Measure | Tract 102 | Richland County |
|---|---|---|
| Total population | 6,370 ±778 | 422,117 |
| Households | 2,666 ±550 | 167,961 |
| Average household size | 2.38 ±0.32 | 2.35 |
| Housing units | 2,969 ±546 | 187,611 |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026); 2020 Census P.L. 94-171 · Check it at data.census.gov
Who lives in Census Tract 102?
The median resident of Census Tract 102 is 47.1 years old; 19.8% are under 18 and 17.6% are 65 or older. The largest group is non-Hispanic white residents at 49.6%, then non-Hispanic Black residents at 37.5%.
| Measure | Tract 102 | Richland County |
|---|---|---|
| Median age | 47.1 ±1.6 | 34.4 |
| Under 18 years | 19.8% ±4.2 pts | 21.6% |
| 65 years and over | 17.6% ±3.4 pts | 14.1% |
| Hispanic or Latino (any race) | 1.0% ±1.4 pts | 6.4% |
| White alone, not Hispanic | 49.6% ±11.6 pts | 39.4% |
| Black or African American alone, not Hispanic | 37.5% ±12.3 pts | 46.9% |
| Asian alone, not Hispanic | 2.2% ±3.2 pts | 3.0% |
| American Indian and Alaska Native alone, not Hispanic | 0.0% ±0.7 pts | 0.1% |
| Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, not Hispanic | 0.0% ±0.7 pts | 0.1% |
| Two or more races, not Hispanic | 4.2% ±4.5 pts | 3.5% |
| Some other race alone, not Hispanic | 5.5% ±6.7 pts | 0.7% |
| Born outside the United States | 3.2% ±2.5 pts | 6.0% |
| Speak a language other than English at home (age 5+) | 10.7% ±8.3 pts | 8.7% |
| Civilian veterans (age 18+) | 11.3% ±4.9 pts | 9.7% |
| With a disability | 14.4% ±5.3 pts | 14.3% |
| No health insurance coverage | 12.1% ±6.5 pts | 8.7% |
| High school graduate or higher (age 25+) | 94.5% ±3.5 pts | 92.2% |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (age 25+) | 42.2% ±10.9 pts | 40.7% |
| Graduate or professional degree (age 25+) | 13.7% ±4.8 pts | 17.3% |
| Lived in the same house a year earlier | 94.0% ±5.8 pts | 80.0% |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profiles DP02, DP05) · Check it at data.census.gov
What do households in Census Tract 102 earn?
Half of the 2,666 households in Census Tract 102 earn less than $61,368 a year (±$20,800), against $63,784 across Richland County: 47th highest of the county's 93 tracts with a reliable estimate. 18.1% of residents live below the poverty line.
| Measure | Tract 102 | Richland County |
|---|---|---|
| Median household income | $61,368 ±$20,800 | $63,784 |
| Mean household income | $83,667 ±$19,057 | $90,966 |
| Per capita income | $36,420 ±$5,697 | $37,859 |
| People below the poverty line | 18.1% ±9.9 pts | 17.2% |
| Children under 18 below the poverty line | 12.4% ±21.4 pts | 22.5% |
| Households receiving SNAP | 8.1% ±6.5 pts | 10.6% |
| Households with a computer | 93.5% ±4.9 pts | 96.7% |
| Households with a broadband subscription | 72.1% ±14.8 pts | 90.4% |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profile DP03) · Check it at data.census.gov
What does housing cost in Census Tract 102?
Owners occupy 79.4% of Census Tract 102's occupied homes and renters 20.6%. The median owner-occupied home is valued at $249,700 by its owner (±$57,747). The median renter pays $679 a month including utilities, and 73.8% of renters pay 35% or more of their income on rent.
| Measure | Tract 102 | Richland County |
|---|---|---|
| Median home value (owner-occupied) | $249,700 ±$57,747 | $242,800 |
| Median gross rent | $679 ±$43 | $1,228 |
| Renters paying 35% or more of income on rent | 73.8% ±35.8 pts | 49.4% |
| Median monthly owner costs, with a mortgage | $1,577 ±$98 | $1,533 |
| Owner-occupied homes | 79.4% ±15.0 pts | 60.3% |
| Renter-occupied homes | 20.6% ±15.0 pts | 39.7% |
| Housing units | 2,969 ±546 | 187,611 |
| Single-family detached homes | 61.6% ±12.2 pts | 63.7% |
| Mobile homes | 36.7% ±12.3 pts | 4.5% |
| Built 2020 or later | 0.0% ±1.5 pts | 2.3% |
| Built 2010 to 2019 | 13.7% ±6.5 pts | 14.4% |
| Built 1939 or earlier | 10.4% ±7.0 pts | 4.3% |
| Households with no vehicle | 2.9% ±2.2 pts | 7.2% |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profile DP04) · Check it at data.census.gov
How do people in Census Tract 102 get to work?
73.1% of Census Tract 102's workers drive alone and 17.1% work from home. The average trip to work takes 29.2 minutes.
| Measure | Tract 102 | Richland County |
|---|---|---|
| In the labor force (age 16+) | 65.4% ±5.5 pts | 64.6% |
| Unemployment rate | 16.3% ±11.3 pts | 6.4% |
| Drove alone to work | 73.1% ±10.0 pts | 71.3% |
| Carpooled | 6.7% ±5.2 pts | 7.9% |
| Public transportation | 0.0% ±1.5 pts | 0.7% |
| Walked | 0.0% ±1.5 pts | 5.4% |
| Worked from home | 17.1% ±7.7 pts | 12.5% |
| Mean travel time to work | 29.2 min ±4.4 | 23.1 min |
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) (Data Profile DP03) · Check it at data.census.gov
How does Census Tract 102 compare with the other tracts in Richland County?
Among Richland County's tracts with a reliable estimate, Census Tract 102 ranks as shown below (1 = highest).
| Measure | In Richland County |
|---|---|
| Population | 19th of 98 |
| Residents per square mile | 95th of 98 |
| Median household income | 47th of 93 |
| Per capita income | 44th of 98 |
| Median home value | 35th of 91 |
| Median gross rent | 92nd of 92 |
| Poverty rate | 44th of 71 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 39th of 91 |
| Median age | 5th of 97 |
| Owner-occupied share | 26th of 92 |
The tracts next to it on Richland County's income ladder
| Tract | Rank | Median household income |
|---|---|---|
| Tract 111.01 | 44th | $65,330±$6,197 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 120 | 45th | $63,854±$24,058 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 107.01 | 46th | $61,863±$12,517 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 102 | 47th | $61,368±$20,800 |
| Tract 104.07 | 48th | $61,232±$4,656 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 4 | 49th | $60,847±$12,407 · within the margin of this tract |
| Tract 114.21 | 50th | $59,912±$11,302 · within the margin of this tract |
"Within the margin": the two incomes differ by less than their combined 90% margins, so the survey cannot say which is higher and the ranks between them are not firm.
Source: PlainCities ranks computed from the American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026) · How ranks are computed
How reliable are the figures for Census Tract 102?
2 of the 18 figures for Census Tract 102 on this page carry a coefficient of variation over 40% and are marked with a ring: they come from a small sample, so read them as rough.
A census tract's figures rest on a few hundred sampled households over five years, so its margins are wider than a city's. Two tracts differ only when the gap between them is larger than their combined 90% margin (the square root of the sum of the two squared margins). How to read a margin of error.
Source: American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau (released January 2026): margins of error as published · Check it at data.census.gov
How these figures are made: methodology and release checks · reading a margin of error · every state · corrections